Sunday, September 26, 2010

Cape May - Skimmer Sunrise - Shot Details

From http://natureandwildlifephotography.blogspot.com/
I took this one a little after sunrise when the sun hid behind some clouds for a moment.

Cape May - Skimmer Sunrise

Shooting at sunrise (or sunset) really makes for a much better starting point for nice images. The low angle and shadows or side lighting can't be beat. And the warmth of it, and orange light is way better than any mid day light might be.

The bulk of the editing done on this shot were two things. First I cloned out a person that was along the shore and distracted from the light and birds. The eye just wanted to go to it. The second thing I did was to clone out the birds that were partial and along the top edge of the shots. They too seemed to be distracting. There were about 4 or 5 of the bird parts, and the parts you could see weren't enough to make an entire bird out of...

I recently commented that editing (and cloning, etc) for content was something I didn't like or do much. In the case of this image I was ok with it. I don't consider myself a purist on things like this. What ever seems to work or what my eye wants is what I go with. But as a rule I guess, I don't shoot and then edit with a mindset of "hmmm, I wonder which parts I should clone out?" That's not how I shoot/edit.

Nikographer.com / Jon

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Chip! Chip Phillips!

This guy rocks. I don't know who he is yet, just found his flickr stream, but he's top notch and has some amazing photos. I couldn't help but blog a few and spread the word.

This photo is a master piece in my humble opinion. It has light, depth, levels, the eye is just overloaded with wonderful things to view and ponder and enjoy!
Leigh Lake Reflections, Grand Teton National Park

If there ever was a photographer that I noticed, and was like wow, and thought for a moment....

Frozen River, Grand Tetons, closer view

This guy is about LIGHT.

Clements Mountain Sunset

I kind of want to shoot at sunrise and sunset or not at all after seeing these images.

Check out his flickr site and be amazed like I have been so far. I can't wait to explore some more.

Nikographer.com / Jon

Friday, September 17, 2010

Birds Fly South

http://natureandwildlifephotography.blogspot.com/

It's that time of year. It has to be. In just 2 days I saw 2 hawks flying overhead while I was driving. And not in the place or area I'd expect them, just in residential areas right off 2 lane roads.



Hawk mountain had a 1,000+ Broadwinged Hawk day yesterday, Cape May had a 100+ American Kestral/hr day after a storm this week. I even saw 5 ducks at my local little pond for the first time in ages. There's been a kingfisher and a green heron there, but no ducks until this week.

I even have seen a handful of flotillas of Canada Geese flying generally southish.

These Guys Rock

If you are looking for volume of subjects, variety like no other time, this is it. Tons of birds are flying south right now.

I wouldn't consider it snow goose time until late November, and December.
Snow Geese - JX75, A5C6, PM44 (3 pix)Taking Flight


Right now it's raptors, hawks, falcons, eagles, owls, and little birdies like warblers, sparrows, all those kinds of birds and hundreds more!
Looking for the birds @ Hawk Mountain, Pa

Sunrise isn't so early anymore,
and sunset isn't so late.
It's not hot out.
It's not cold out.

Do you like to complain? There's nothing to complain about now.

I'm going shooting!
Female Dark Eyed Slate-colored JuncoMale Snail KiteMagnolia WarblerHawk Hill
nice shot

Nikographer.com / Jon

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Chincoteague NWR, VA pt2

From http://natureandwildlifephotography.blogspot.com/

What's neat about shooting at Chincoteague is getting to see some new behavior.

On a previous trip I was watching the herons and egrets and noticed how the gulls group up with them. The gulls don't seem to bother the herons and egrets much but they do key off of them - some times stealing their catch. What was interesting to watch though was how the gulls imitate the snowy egrets. The egrets will use their feet to stir up the bottom and get critters to reveal themselves. I saw a gull using its feet in the same way, it had to have learned it from the herons and egrets.

Shooting across from the visitors center out near the beach is surprisingly good. I would have thought the traffic or other visitors might detract, but it worked well.



I have this low LL Bean chair, it sits about 4 inches off the ground and makes for a nice seat to use and stay low, and off the sometimes wet/muddy ground.



One thing that I try to avoid is shooting from head high, tripod high, for no reason. Often I will collapse the legs on my tripod to the shortest height and then sit down, or I will extend the legs just slightly and kneel or crouch. I've only gone in to a full horizontal shooting stance a few times, but getting that low makes a difference. The two main things are the angle is more intimate, being closer to the subject, and the other thing it does is makes me less imposing - so I am not towering over a 1 feet subject standing 6 feet tall. Staying low can make a big difference like this. A couple of trips about at Chincoteague I slid closer to a group of herons and got within 20 or 25 feet of them. THey knew I was there but over time I slowly got closer and didn't trigger their fear and they stayed put, hunting, unbothered. When I was done shooting and stood up - every bird flew away. Many came back as I walked away, but that just shows the contrast of standing vs. sitting and the way birds might respond.

This Redish Egret had just caught and ate a crab - and then proceeded to stick its head underwater so it could slowly look for the other bits (legs and claws). It was neat to see and the undisturbed water made for some nice reflections...

Chincoteague NWR, VA





Nikographer.com / Jon

Friday, September 10, 2010

Chincoteague NWR, VA

From http://natureandwildlifephotography.blogspot.com/

I've now been something like 5 or 6 times to Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge in Virginia.

It is a pretty cool refuge - with pools and areas protected from the coast, as well as the beach right up on the Atlantic Ocean. In the summer it is a hotspot for beach goers and folks looking for wildlife too.

Compared to Blackwater NWR the mix of animals if very different in the summer. Blackwater has lots of eagles and osprey, and some herons. Chincoteague has the ponies (!) and a couple eagles and a few osprey, but most of what I saw were herons and egrets of many varieties. Things like Little Blue Herons, Redish Egrets, Snowy Egrets and Cattle Egrets are in good numbers, and of those many I've never seen at Blackwater. Something about being right along the coast makes Chincoteague have more and different birds I think.

Chincoteague NWR, VA

While I've seen a handful of Black Skimmers there, I heard that over on the "NASA beach" there's like a billion. Which I would guess translates in to actually thousands, but I don't know. From what the person said it is only accessible by NASA employees. :/

Black Skimmer @ Chincoteague, NWR VA

In August I got some shots of the Cattle Egrets working from the backs of the Ponies! It was pretty darn cool to see. I need to review the images again and post one to flickr, they're ok but so far I wasn't super jazzed about any one image based on composition, details, behavior, etc. But here's a preview where an Egret is jumping off the back of the pony and heading to the ground to catch something. The egrets hunt for the critters that the ponies reveal as they walk around.




I'm still learning the refuge and the ins and outs, and what works best and when - both time of day and time of year.

One of the challenges is that it is pretty crowded, so it is tough to have a quiet and controlled encounter. The Wildlife Drive is open to foot and bike traffic all day, and then also car traffic after 3pm. The wildlife drive has proven cool, but I don't think I've gotten ANY of my favorite shots from there, except for a few skimmer shots. Most of what I like has been taken along the road to the beach or adjacent to the beach itself.

I'm sure the wildlife drive is better in Fall with more migratory birds there, and less people traffic. Many people I've spoken to talk about visiting in Fall and NOT summer. I like to explore and come up with those rules myself - so I visited a few times this summer, and did ok, but now hope to do even better in Fall...

-Jon
Nikographer.com / Jon

Thursday, September 9, 2010

A Photo Edit - Black and White Red Fox

From http://natureandwildlifephotography.blogspot.com/

I've meant to do more posts like this one. A quick take on the edit techniques used to process an image. Doing this for a straightforward image with little edits doesn't offer much. But for many images that I make there's a decent distance between what the camera captured, and how I've interpreted it, edited it, and then produced the final image.

Here's a composite with the final image on top. The bottom two images are from the raw file and are the basic images, reset to defaults in Lightroom and then color (default) and grayscale.
for blog

One of the main problems with the source image was it wasn't that sharp. It was the sharpest of the bunch from the encounter, but at 1/30th of a second at f/4, and a mix of handheld and resting on my car window/beanbag - it was hard to get a sharp shot.

color/default-raw
red fox edits

The sharpest part is his nose, and the DoF falls off pretty quickly. As a straight color image his eyes and attention are gripping but the image itself isn't refined enough in my opinion. The above is overly flat due to no processing, but shows signs of animal behavior and intent and that'x what drew me to the photo/moment.

Default/Grayscale
red fox edits

Switching to grayscale removes color and distraction, and elements that might make the mind wander. Color is a strong element on its own but for this image I really wanted to narrow the scope of it to just the fox. Converting to black and white, even though I have black and white on the brain lately, was probably a very justified move.

OK - so that's the setup. That's what I had to work with. I had seen the fox and due to the low light was shooting at pretty slow shutter speeds and wide open. My personal preference is to shoot wide open at ISO 400 and SLOW shutter speeds and let the cards fall where they may on sharpness. I don't always stick to this rule, but I try to avoid shooting at any ISO above 400. There's something about my D300 and D300s that ISO500 or beyond, just make me concerned regarding noise.

Anyway... I've been reading a book. I got it probably a year ago and just picked it up again. The book is Vincent Versace's "Welcome to Oz". In it he describes using Photoshop to turn a source image in to an artistic vision, an interpretation, something where the source file is just the starting point.

I highly recommend everyone listen to this podcast with Vinny (as I hear he's called).

Some of the concepts he talks about are how the eye moves through an image - light to dark, high contrast to low contrast, etc, etc..... Things that make sense but not what you might be concerned with when processing an image where you are really trying to (for me anyway) showcase a subject (often an animal) and show to others what you see.

So - here's the final black and white edit. This was done in Lightroom, and I used the adjustment brush a few times with different levels of lightening and darkening.

Bombay Hook NWR, DE

A few key edits I did were to darken the image and edges, and brighten the eyes and his nose. I also darkened the original bright spot on tht http://natureandwildlifephotography.blogspot.com/e right. Having done that edit, I removed some noise in PS with D-fine, and added my logo.

It's fine to want to get it all right in camera and I shoot for that too. Heck I shot jpg for like 3 years! Now that I shoot RAW and manual mode I strive for getting the source file as good as possible. However there's often much more to an image than that.

Let me know what you think. I'm not looking to stir up the purist's who'd capture it in camera and do NO edits ever... What do folks think about editing images to enhance and convey, and make an image become an artist photo?

-Jon

Nikographer.com / Jon

Always be shooting and creating

From http://natureandwildlifephotography.blogspot.com/

While I will occasionally take a short break from either shooting or posting, I generally like to always be active and shooting and harvesting images.

Chincoteague NWR, VA

This past long weekend I was very active and drove 600 miles plus, and visited 6 different places including 3 refuges, the DC Zoo, Rennfest and Susquehanna River.

I think I must have taken more than 3 or 4 thousand images. Given that amount of shooting it becomes a lot easier to have stuff to work with and find what looks best, what worked well, and process and post something.

Bombay Hook NWR, DE

Part of what keeps me motivated is a desire to always have something new to post and share.

This time of year, in between summer and fall - I am trying to hit as many spots / places as possible to check in with locations and see where they are during the changing seasons. In past years I'd try to make it to a couple locations very frequently and now I am trying to cast a wider net. Going some place super frequently has its benefits as far as learning the location and specifics. But now I am doing more than that, and often will also do over night trips to extend my reach - for example like visiting Chincoteague NWR.

Out on a Limb

I can't wait for fall to kick in to full gear.

-50-



Nikographer.com / Jon

Friday, September 3, 2010

Black and White Photography

From - http://natureandwildlifephotography.blogspot.com/


Black and white photography is nice right, but color is so much better! Well, hmmm.

These days we all shoot color. There's no "film" in the digital world anymore, and they don't make "black and white cameras" - so that's just how it is. Color.

But really, black and white can be even stronger than color. In a way it is like the power of still over motion pictures. Movies convey more info, but a still image is less and therefore more refined, the data is more concentrated on the message or specific moment, or mood captured.

I am new to thinking in black and white. I did shoot black and white film in school and did the development myself, but that was forever ago.

A handful of times I've found B&W images or digital conversions to be the way to go. Often it is for Gorillas or Giant Pandas at the zoo.

Return of Kong!

Yes, yes, post this one on the interweb-tubes!

Luke!!!

"Stroke" - 2 of 2 - Georgetown Crew / Potomac River Rowers


A week ago I was listening to a podcast or something and I decided to make a change to my camera, to how I shoot and maybe how I see.

On my D300s I enabled monochromatic mode, while set to RAW+JPG. This has a couple of nice benefits. Shooting RAW still allows for everything I've been used to - full color images, RAW processing, etc. But it also makes the back of the camera images all visible in black and white. And it saves a copy of the black and white iamge as a JPG.

I think I'm going to leave it like this for a while. Maybe even try to turn it in to a project. The going vertical project from a number of months ago was fun and helped kick me in a different direction, and helped me to think and see just a little differently. I shoot both ways, but restricted my posting for about 50 shots in a row to vertical only.

The effects of trying to see and shoot in black and white might be even more beneficial. Good color can make an ok image better, but if it were better to begin with the color might set it over the top. Black and white. I'm hoping it raises my composition skills, and gives me a better eye.

We'll see. Stay tuned.

-Jon
Nikographer.com / Jon

Thursday, September 2, 2010

Gear Tune Up - Success

From http://natureandwildlifephotography.blogspot.com/

I should have done it sooner - I knew both my main cameras were acting up a little and had focus problems. Over the last few years I have sent in every camera I've owned except the Fuji S5 (D200 with different guts/sensor)- probably because I don't have a lot of wear on it.

My D300s is a year old (I think) and was doing ok but then started to focus hunt and then stop - and had trouble being "Accurate". Having had trouble in the past, I tried the same lens on my D300 and had somewhat better luck (but a different problem). So I began to use my D300 for action / birds in flight. I sent in the D300s to be tuned, cleaned, and calibrated - and they did just that and it works much better now. Nikon service fixed it for free, doing the work under warranty.

The D300s was still functional but didn't perform well. So I found myself juggling bodies for action and then video - because the D300s does video and the D300 doesn't. That finally got old, and with the summer wrapping up, and fall just around the corner I got the D300s fixed. It has about 48,000 shots on it now.

Now the D300.

This camera has been in for service now 3 times. It has over 120,000 shots on it and I've used it for around 3 years. The first time I sent it in was for the same type of focus trouble that the D300s had - hunting, bad performance, and giving up trying to focus without having gained focus. The second time was when a sensor for the mirror went bad - the mirror would bounce during the shutter/exposure, and would then stay UP, not down. The camera was a couple years old and I think I had to pay for the repair. But when I got it back the focus points didn't line up with the actual focus.

It was strange, if you selected the center focus point it would often appear to be ok, but in fact it was getting focus from just to the left and down about a sensor's width and height over. There were two very specific hints that something was very wrong with the camera when I got it back. The screen cover for the back of the camera was cracked.

Then about 2 weeks later I noticed that the hotshoe wouldn't accept a flash - it was bent a bit and the flash didn't fit. It was then I knew the camera had been dropped. I didn't drop it, and I doubt HIGHLY that Nikon Service would drop it and wrap it up and send it back. So, since it was boxed and in bubble wrap, the only way it could have happened during the repair process - was if the store I sent it back via had done it. They must have got the camera back, and during the unboxing processes dropped it, it bounced, cracked the screen, bent the hot shoe, and what took the most time to discover - WHACKED the focus alignments/calibration.

I won't name the store, but they've got a history of being jerks in my local community - and they won't be getting any of my business any more.

So, when I sent it in asking for cleaning and adjustments, and calibration to fix focus, and the misaligned focus points, nearly a year later, I expected Nikon Service to charge me. But THEY are good. Unlike the store that broke stuff and pretended nothing happened - Nikon Service just fixed it under the old repair warranty. Now that's nice, not to have to complain, or beg, or pay for it to be made right.

I shot this with the repaired D300s - it's at 400mm and 1/160th of a second.

African Leopard @ MD Zoo

One big thing to consider is that focus is a fickle thing - and it impacts how VR performs. VR uses focus as part of its math (from what I've heard) - so having a poorly performing focus system may make VR less effective. Before I had the camera recently repaired getting a good infocus, sharp shot like the above was very hard. They all seemed to just be off a little.

I don't know if it will be very noticeable in this osprey photo taken with the broken camera months ago - because it is one of the better ones, but the focus is just behind the head, more towards the body. What I found, probably the hardest case for a camera to focus well in, is that for birds in flight, where the distance is changing, ie toward the camera, a poorly performing camera will not do well. I think it lags behind, and might seem to be "back-focus" but it is more likely "lag-focus" where the camera is just behind in its calculations, and can't get it right / or perfect, and the movement makes it visible.

MD Osprey

This spring and summer I literally took thousands of birds in flight shots that left me wanting more, better focus, sharper detail... Having been out shooting now just a couple weeks with the repaired D300s - I found it much better at doing a good job. And even in the hardest cases - like seeing a flying bird and wipping up the camera/lens and trying to get focus before it vanishes from view - it did ok, fast, and accurately. The repaired D300s even did ok on far off moving birds in FOG! Fog is rough, and it did ok.

----

~4 years ago I broke my D70s with about 45,000 shots on it - breaking the shutter! Nikon fixed it for free. Since then the card reader/writer died, and it randomly takes a shot and turns the card in to jibberish and writes random stuff to it. I haven't had it fixed, but I still have it. The electronic shutter (aka strobist hackable) makes it worth it - some day I will pursue getting that repaired.

~1 year ago I had my D200 refurbished - cleaned, tuned, adjusted, and had the rubber-grip replaced so it looked like new! And they only charged me around ~240 if I recall correctly. That camera had around 160,000 shots on it at the time.

I am pretty ready for fall now. The D300 will be back in my hands probably in a week. All I need to get tuned up is my 80-400mm which probably needs gears replaced because I have really beaten it up over the years and it doesn't focus well, and no where near as cleanly as a new 80-400mm (I've borrowed a friends).

The Take Away - get your gear (mainly body) tuned, cleaned, and focus-adjusted every year if you shoot a lot, and every couple years if you shoot some. And if you think your camera isn't performing, focus, metering, etc, properly, SEND IT IN right away.

Sending stuff to Nikon now - I use UPS and insure for the replacement cost, and Nikon Service in Melville NY is very fair and does a great job.

Nikographer.com / Jon